Business Ethic

MGT3201 / 3231 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND GRADING STRUCTURE Individual Case Study (20%) This assessment criteria and grading structure is used as the 1. general guidelines for marking indite coursework, and 2. feedback to the students for future improvement. Content Analysis Evidence of Reflection Achievement of learnedness Outcomes 20 Excellent quality of Extremely through analysisDescribes and evaluates all exuberant synthesis of the content very wide eye socket of material given high events from multiple module through the of options considered, level of self-awareness perspectives transfers achievement learning chimerical and creative and aspirations concepts beyond that outcomes and full 17 approach. Excellent range convincing and lucid particular setting understanding of the of appropriate resources acknowledgment of choices recognizing and justifying process. used. made. the impact of a specific situation on learning. 16. Very good quality content,Ve ry through analysis Describes ad evaluates nigh Some evaluation of the wide range of options very good level of events from different Learning Outcomes. considered, through self-awareness and perspectives transfers almost approach. Very good use ofaspirations through concepts can recognize 14 resources available. plea of choices impact of specific situations made. on learning. 13. 9 Good quality content, Good analysis good level Describes and evaluates Evidence of application of reasonable range of of self-awareness some events but stays in one the learning outcomes. options considered. Good justification of choices domain. use of resources. made. 10 9. 9 Satisfactory content with Some analysis some levelsUses practical and simplisticEvidence of understanding few options considered. of self-awareness, little statements to describe the Learning Outcomes. May be less through justification.Limited events some sense of pee-pee approach. Some eviden ce ofexplanation of choices and effect some sense of 6 use of resources. made. transfer. 5. 9 Meager quality of content,Adequate analysis little Descries own(prenominal) experience Acknowledgement of the only one or two options level of self-awareness only little sense of cause Learning Outcomes. considered. Very basic, limited justification and effect little sense of limited approach.Poor usepoor explanation of transfer. 3 of resources. choices made. 2. 9 Very poor quality of No evidence of analysis. Describes personal experienceFew Learning Outcomes content, no detail. No in a simplistic manner only. achieved. evidences of use of 0 resources. ? 1500 word compensate (excluding appendices) Content, relevancy to the topic title, authenticity of material provided and etc. ? Literature Review (Resources) ? Emphasis on Referencing (Harvard Referencing System) ? The Assignment should be of an analysis, evaluative, argumentative, synthesis of moral justifica tions, reasoning , succinct & lucid and excellent range of appropriate resources used rather than purely descriptive and should include a number of appendices, containing Supporting evidence for findings, analysis, conclusions and Recommendations Assessment branchMGT3201 / MGT3231 Business Ethics Case Study Group Members1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1) Define the Issue __________________________________________________________________ ) Analysis / Arguments __________________________________________________________________ 3) Evidence of reflection / Justification __________________________________________________________________ 4) Moral Reasoning / Achievement of Learning Outcome __________________________________________________________________ 5) Resources __________________________________________________________________ Total Score_____ / 100 marks Final Percentage_____ / 20% Guidelines for the Individual Report (20%) In order to facilitate processing of the donnish standard of report, please follow the general guidelines for the format and preparation of the individual report. Must have the following formatting Spacing double line paragraphs pillow slip Tahoma 10 or 11 point or Times New Roman 12 point Bolds emphasis of paragraph titles or headings Margins set at 1 (top, bottom, left and right sides) Justification left Page numbering beginning on first page of report (not cover page) Headers or footers surname of student & ID, programme of study, academic session Spelling and grammar checked Programs Microsoft Word or Excel if you have tables is preferred.